Toyota Sienna Forum - siennachat.com banner
1 - 8 of 8 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have a 2005 Sienna with only 52700 miles on itI have never replaced the timing belt in this vehicle as there is still a long way to go to the mileage based replacement which is 90k I think. That said, this vehicle is now 18 years old with its original timing belt.
Should I wait until I hit 90k, which will probably be at least another 4 years, or should it be replaced due to age ?

Thanks !
 

· Registered
2nd gen. 2004 FWD Sienna LE with 3.3 L 3MZ-FE engine, 250K miles as of Feb. 2023
Joined
·
57 Posts
Wow, how did you manage to drive so little in 18 years! Haha. Anyway, that is a really good question. My impression from this forum is that timing belts are still in pretty good shape after 100,000 miles, but almost everyone is driving at least 10,000 miles yearly. A rubber belt is going to be a lot like rubber sidewalls on a tire. It degrades over time just like tire sidewalls show "dry rot" or whatever they call it, whether or not the tires have gone a lot of miles. Tire sidewalls are often in bad shape after only 6 or 7 years. My understanding is that an interference engine like the 3.3 L V6 can be badly damaged if the belt breaks or slips, so I don't believe that I would try to get the prescribed 90,000 miles out of it. Oxygen and ozone in the air slowly breaks the rubber down, "dries" it out and cracks it. I don't think the manufacturer of the belt is going to say it's good for 20 years, but you could look and see if they make a recommendation. I think someone on this site said that Aisin was the original equipment manufacturer for the belt. Unless there is some way of inspecting the belt much easier than the repair itself, I think I would replace the belt pretty soon before 90,000 miles. Should probably do the water pump at the same time.
 

· Registered
2020 Sienna LE
Joined
·
505 Posts
You're missing part of the change interval requirement. Its not just 90k. Its 90k or X years. I cant remember for sure but I think its like 8 or 9 years. So either way, you're way over due.
Like Dan said, look at anything rubber and see if it can withstand the elements of cold and heat year after year. Rubber dries out over time, simple as that.

Maybe it looks like this belt. How long do you think this might last?

 

· Registered
2nd gen. 2004 FWD Sienna LE with 3.3 L 3MZ-FE engine, 250K miles as of Feb. 2023
Joined
·
57 Posts
I just checked a Honda owners site and Quora for you. Someone, sounding authoritative, at each site said belts are supposed to be changed within 8 years. While I am sure manufacturers are very conservative about this, you are clearly on borrowed time. Better get that belt changed tomorrow!
 

· Registered
Joined
·
167 Posts
I have a 2005 Sienna with only 52700 miles on itI have never replaced the timing belt in this vehicle as there is still a long way to go to the mileage based replacement which is 90k I think. That said, this vehicle is now 18 years old with its original timing belt.
Should I wait until I hit 90k, which will probably be at least another 4 years, or should it be replaced due to age ?

Thanks !
no you NEED to replace the belt immediately. They only last 10 years. It's not just MILES, it's AGE as well.

if you skimp out on this, you WILL destroy the engine when it snaps.
 

· Registered
2020 Sienna LE
Joined
·
505 Posts
Wow, I think a few people on here can calm down a bit. Yes, belt is old and its due, but implying that the world will come to an end is a bit harsh.
Using all caps, exclamations, or bold doesnt make stuff more life or death.

DC Dave said all that needed to be said, how much more does this dead horse need to be beat?
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top