All of it. I don't like:
- Gen 4 styling is too aggressive, IMO. It's a minivan (or rather swagger wagon) and not sports/race car.
- Non removable 2nd row seats limiting my cargo space from 150 cu ft (up to 1st row).
- Gas prices and environment reasons such as wasted energy during braking in addition to maintenance costs of ICE after high mileage ownership/usage due to too many moving parts.
- Even the largest SUV Toyota has to offer, the Sequoia at about 120 cu ft (up to 1st row), still pales in cargo space to gen 3.
- Being able to lift the vehicle for off road for the ultimate cross over and one bad ass look
I haven't quite work out the math for the alternators yet but I figured that if an alternator is able to charge the battery or drive the rear wheels in gen 4, what if you have 3+ alternators? In the event that hybrid does not work, I have backup of using Toyota's fuel cell module(s). Just need to figure out the dimensions and placement.
My reasons for going quad motors, each driving the wheel directly via the axle (maybe a gear or 2 involved similar to Tesla ?):
- Smaller motors for easier placement instead of 2 large motors (1 front and 1 rear)
- If a motor died (up to 3), I could still get somewhere in limp mode.
- Get all the benefits of 4WD's locking differentials without its drawback
- Get all the benefits of LSD on turns by reducing power appropriately on the inner wheels via mathematical calculations
- No transmission, transfer case, LSD to worry about (less weight, mechanical complications, and maintenance of moving parts) if I can get 4 exact motors or at least 2 matching pairs
- In eco mode, I could use FWD or RWD. In sport mode, all 4 are used. If I have larger rear motors, I can also enjoy drift .. lol. I can also "shift on the fly" from eco to sport and vice versa unlike most of the current 4WD system.