Toyota Sienna Forum - siennachat.com banner

Does anyone use and recommend a specific EFI fuel additive?

24K views 16 replies 8 participants last post by  raebitz  
#1 ·
Just purchased a used 2019 Sienna to replace my 2004 (which served me well for 222k miles). I never used an additive in my 2004, I see the recommended maintenance on the 2019 includes "Add Toyota EFI Tank Additive or equivalent (Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Saipan and American Samoa only)". It sounds like those specific locations could lack the cleaners normally found in gas in the contiguous 48 states.

I was wondering how many do use an additive, and if so, which one?
 
#2 ·
Most fuels in North America contain sufficient additive packages to keep valve stems clean. DI engines, however, might require more (jury is still out on this one). Top Tier gas should have everything you need.

For years I've used Techron, but most of the dealerships push BG. And then there's Seafoam (used that in the 'pour down the throat method' on an older care once). Who knows....
 
#5 ·
Up thru 2016 (2GR-FE engine) = 1 port injector per cylinder.

2017 FKS variant (Atkinson Cycle) has dual injectors per cylinder (port and DI).
 
#9 ·
We HOPE that there is sufficient fuel flow from the port injector to PREVENT carbon deposit build-up, and not just SLOW the build-up. That's why I say time will tell.....
 
#11 ·
If you look deep enough into the tech docs, you will see critical differences in use and dwell time of each injector in relationship to RPM, load, operating temperature, etc. Sometimes one is favored over the other, sometimes they both run. Each engine's operation is different, as is the vehicle application. Each combo carries a unique mapping.

That says to me that the eventual outcome of this near identical powertrain applied to the Highlander and Sienna could be different.

Engineering is all about sweating the details.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: hangman
#12 ·
That is correct, and you are right in that each application is different, even down to the level of how each driver uses their vehicles. But since the system has been in place for about 13 years across vastly different vehicle types which would encompass vast driving dynamics differences, I would expect that within this time, if there was a carbon buildup issue similar to the way the Germans have developed their DI systems, it would have surfaced by now. But that is just an assumption on my part.
 
#13 ·
By design with at least partial flow over the valve stem, the Toyota system seems inherently better in terms of resisting carbon deposit buildup. And the data reports so far, within the limits of sample size and vocal people actually screaming out loud about it, does seem to support that it is indeed better. No question about that. It's not the outright disaster that some GDI systems have become. But call me guardedly optimistic. I don't think we've seen sufficient data yet to say that it isn't happening at a reduced level.

Remember that an engine can run acceptably well with an awful amount of crud buildup thanks to adaptive mixture regulation. Fuel trims could be up several points, and 99.9% of drivers will never be the wiser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hangman
#15 ·
As the initial responder said, Techron fuel system cleaner does a great job of cleaning out the system. Redline fuel system treatment is also good, but is only found at Pep Boys or online. Both have the same active ingredient whose name I cannot recall. Just pour some in your gas a few times a year.